?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Son God - I'm not really Stanley Lieber. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Stanley Lieber

[ website | stanley. ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| archive comics flickr itrecords rss thegreen tumblr twitter vr www youtube ]

Son God [Mar. 4th, 2006|05:09 am]
Stanley Lieber
[Tags|, , , , , , , , , , , , ]





 

Son God

1997

 


01. The Word
02. The Eyes Have It
03. Again Together With The Celestial Disc
04. Never Again
05. George Rat
06. Christ Is 6
07. Virtual Jesus
08. The Duat



Originally released September 12, 1997. From the liner notes:

    I still like this album and I refuse to make excuses for it.




Edit:

Click here for the lyrics.



tracks permanently archived in multiple formats at archive.org

creative.commons.attribution-noncommercial.2.5

* license





LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: dzima
2006-03-04 11:41 am (UTC)
Don't post it now that I'm about to restart my recording sessions!

Now I don't know what to do ;)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 12:03 pm (UTC)
This has been sitting in a box for nine years, it will be here when you get back!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cap_scaleman
2006-03-04 01:56 pm (UTC)
Your earlier works have some kind of humour in them in my oppinion. Perhaps because you wheren't a pro with all kinds of gadgets back then.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 08:04 pm (UTC)
I was hugely influenced by myself:

http://www.inri.net/zines/FUCK(tm)

Up until about 2003 I was doing all my music under the name 'INRI' or 'Virtual Jesus,' which is referenced on this album. It was a whole different trip.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cap_scaleman
2006-03-05 04:57 pm (UTC)
Looks like we really need a "Stanleylieber inerview part 2".
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-05 11:03 pm (UTC)
If you have stuff you want to ask me I'm game.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cap_scaleman
2006-03-05 11:11 pm (UTC)
I have nothing particular right now, I have an interview with Dzima that is soon ready to get up. Dunno when though(Thanks to school, argh!).
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: landruc
2006-03-04 03:08 pm (UTC)
What here could use excusing?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 08:02 pm (UTC)
Well, it sounds like it's being listened to under water. I wrote those liner notes when first uploaded it to the Internet (circa 1999-2000), and I was a bit unnerved by how terrible all my tapes sounded, with regards to hiss, generation loss (from 4-track to 2-track stereo master) and general low fidelity. However, I like the songs. They even have lyrics! Some of which are embedded in the ID3 information of the MP3s...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: nomorepolitics
2006-03-04 07:26 pm (UTC)
So you've grown more confident with all the positive feedback?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 08:07 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure what zapped the initial upload of these tracks. By process of elimination it must have been the Creative Commons upload client. I followed the exact same steps (minus the Creative Commons upload client) and now the MP3s are accessible by everyone. This post is identical to the first one (now removed).

I don't know if I would say I've grown more confident. In some ways it's more difficult now to make music without considering how people are going to 'take' it. In the old days I had no listeners so that was never an issue. :)

Although I have to say it is kind of interesting to see what people think about this old stuff. At the time it was made no one I gave it to would even comment.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: nomorepolitics
2006-03-04 08:22 pm (UTC)
I couldn't tell you what I think the problem was.

I have a bunch of special, rare, and i****** applications and codecs on my computers, which help bypass incompatibility problems. For the most part, I try not to use either microsoft or macintosh software, when I can get away with it.

This is great for the receiving end. But probably, if I was producing stuff for other people, they would have trouble playing it.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 09:31 pm (UTC)
By the way, thanks for your comments on the other thread. It's great that someone has finally listened to this stuff.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dzima
2006-03-04 10:07 pm (UTC)
I like number 3 and 5 the best.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 10:12 pm (UTC)
Thanks. I sure wish I hadn't lost the lyrics to 3.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cheapsurrealist
2006-03-04 10:10 pm (UTC)
Thanks for reformating. The audio quality seems to be much better. Maybe it's just Realplayer vs. QT
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-04 10:14 pm (UTC)
Evidently the Creative Commons publisher client inserts the metadata in strange places. Everything is encoded at the same bitrate this time but I agree, it sounds better now.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: anglerfish96
2006-03-08 06:22 am (UTC)
I liked this a lot. The lyrics are quite good!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-08 07:32 am (UTC)
Thank you!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-09 08:18 pm (UTC)
It is a signpost of our age that I cannot determine if you are being sarcastic or not.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: stanleylieber
2006-03-10 05:11 am (UTC)
One has to be ever vigilant!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)